![]() ![]() Another survey was done in 1994, whereupon it was learned that all three surveys drew different boundary lines for the property. In 1982, the land was surveyed again, however the boundary lines were significantly different than those that had been drawn during the 1955 survey. Westbrook marked out with iron stakes the boundary lines that he had measured. Westbrook, to survey the land forming the property line between lot 76 and lot 77. In 1955, Ruth hired a land surveyor, N.S. Instead, the land was consistently described as having a certain number of acres “more or less.” The legal description at that time had not been updated to include metes and bounds. Ralph passed away in 1952, whereupon the land was transferred to Ruth Martin. On April 6, 1951, Byrd transferred the land to Ralph Patton. ![]() In 1942, when a piece of land was sold to Byrd Patton, the legal description of that land did not contain metes and bounds. Metes and Bounds Example Involving a Transfer of LandĪn example of metes and bounds problems involved a transfer of land, which had never been properly measured. For instance, metes and bounds surveys are now accompanied by images from MapQuest and GlobeXplorer, both of which can show a more detailed representation of the precise boundaries being discussed. In addition to the easily identifiable abbreviations that are used in the metes and bounds survey, technology has also made it possible to include more precise images. The assessor’s parcel number is the property’s tax identification number.ĬOM AT E 1/4 POST OF SEC, TH S 1 DEG 05′ E 112.42 FT IN E LINE OF SEC, TH S 66 DEG 08′ W 702.70 FT IN CENT OF HWY FOR PL OF BEG, TH S 14 DEG 06′ E 850.03 FT, TH S 66 DEG 09′ W 244.27 FT, TH N 22 DEG 40′ W 542.46 FT, TH N 66 DEG 09′ E 843.26 FT IN CENT OF HWY TO THE PL OF BEG, SEC 2, T2S-R7E, 3.62 AC. The following is an actual example of a metes and bounds survey that was recorded in Superior Township, Washtenaw County, Michigan. These jurisdictions typically rely on streets and their intersections to define the boundaries of each electoral district. The history of metes and bounds use affects election constituency boundaries today as well, as these are still described using metes and bounds, even in jurisdictions where they are not used in property sales. To this day, Texas still primarily uses the metes and bounds system due to the fact that it was an independent republic prior to achieving statehood. The history of metes and bounds use continues today in those states that were originally part of the Thirteen Colonies – or before 1785 – in areas where land was being allocated, such as Maine, Tennessee, West Virginia, and Vermont. The history of metes and bounds use came into play back during the days of the original colonies making up the United States. This is because a more detailed definition would otherwise be either too expensive to carry out, or simply unnecessary. For instance, a manmade wall, public roadway, or even an existing building can serve as a plot of land’s “bounds.” Bounds are often used to define bigger pieces of property, such as farms, or political subdivisions, including a town’s boundaries. “Bounds” is a term that is used to describe a property’s boundary lines in a more general sense. This means that metes can be described as north, south, east, or west. A property’s direction may be as simple as a compass point, or the direction that each point of the property faces. Metes can also be found by determining a plot of land’s direction. “Metes” are a piece of property’s boundary lines, as determined by measuring its “straight runs.” A straight run is the distance between two points. ![]() 70 W (range 70 west) of the 6th PM (the sixth principal meridian, a north–south reference line) in ABC County, Colorado, bears N 45° W 1,320 feet, at which point of beginning an iron stake has been placed thence south 600 feet to a point also marked by an iron stake thence N 45° W 700 feet to a large oak tree thence northeasterly to the point of beginning.” “Beginning at a point from which the north quarter corner of Section 4, T. While the system is still used today, technology has greatly improved upon its associated tools and measurements.Ĭonsider the following example of metes and bounds description, which describes a roughly triangular-shaped piece of property using distance, direction, and compass points, as well as manmade markers that were used to mark out the property for future reference: ![]() A metes and bounds description of a piece of land is referred to as its “legal description,” as opposed to being distinguishable by a mere street address or lot number. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |